5/1/96, Times Argus
ISSUE OF ANARCHY A SMOKE SCREEN
Editor, Times Argus:
As a core faculty member at Goddard College and director of the
Goddard Business Institute, I would like to respond to Robert
Piasecki's out-of-context claim that I declared myself an anarchistic
at the Goddard Rally for Democracy last Thursday ("Goddard Group
Gathers To Denounce Greene," April 26)
and then move past this "anarchy" smoke screen to discuss Goddard's
real struggle.
In my talk I was responding to the April 23rd
editorial, "Anarchy 101." I noted that my colleagues at the
conventional business and planning schools where I taught economics
and finance for 30 years (Columbia, Cornell, Yale, Tufts, and MIT)
would be quite amused and amazed to learn that they had been associating
with an "anarchist." I said sarcastically that if being an "anarchist"
meant being opposed to the concentration of power in large institutions,
power that was not accountable to the larger society, then I was an
"anarchist." The Times Argus' characterization of me as an "anarchist"
should have been, in reality, "Democrat." Quoting my conclusion without
reporting the premise it was based on, your reporter sensationalized my
remark in a misleading, inaccurate and irresponsible manner.
The issue at Goddard College is not anarchy. It is about bringing
the college's philosophy and practice into balance with leadership that
values democratic principles. The college's difficulty is in resolving
the contradiction between its top-down structure of authority and its
60-year, democratic tradition of shared decision-making. The vertical
structure with its concentration of information and authority clashes
with the horizontal culture promoted by the college's ideals.
If Goddard can bring its structure and culture into line, and become
a college that integrates democracy and education, where students
combine self-directed education with the learning of democracy firsthand
through genuine participation in a democratic institution, then it may
be able to return to the forefront of progressive education. As a small
independent school, Goddard cannot compete with well endowed liberal
arts colleges; realizing its commitment to progressive education may be
our best bet at attracting students and surviving.
Richard Schramm
![]()
|